Saturday, September 28, 2013

"Freedom doesn’t exist if you don’t use it"


Margaret Heffernan: The dangers of "willful blindness"



Willful blindness, “is a legal concept which means, if there’s information that you could know and you should know but you somehow manage not to know, the law deems that you’re willfully blind.” - Margaret Heffernan

I have been thinking about a topic for the blog, and just when I was struggling, I got distracted to listen to a Ted Talk by Margaret Heffernan. It turned out to be the best distraction for the day.

In her Ted Talk, Heffernan told a story of Gayla Benefield uncovered a terrible secret behind the unusual high mortality rate (it was 80 times higher than anywhere else in the U.S.) in her hometown. As she was trying to reveal the truth to people, she found out people are primed to ignore the evidence that something is wrong happening in their community.  They do not want to know or believe it. Some people were aware of that problem, and knew it was wrong, but chose to ignore it and not tell anyone.

Key Highlights of Heffernan’s presentation:



  • ·       “And the truth is, this is a human problem. We’re all, under certain circumstances, willfully blind.”
  • ·       “… some people are blind out of fear. They are afraid of retaliation. And some people are blind because they think, well, seeing anything is just futile. Nothing’s ever going to change… if we protest against the Iraq War, nothing changes, so why bother? Better not to see this stuff at all.”
  • ·       Most people often think whistleblowers are crushed; yet some whistleblowers actually took it as pride.
  • ·       Freedom doesn’t exist if you don’t use it, and what whistleblowers do, and what people like Gayla Benefield do is they use the freedom they have.

I found this presentation applicable not only to our society, but on a personal level as well. The tendency of willful blindness, according to Heffernan, exists from a large scale like Gayla’s case to organizations and institutions and to small scales like in families and communities. Instead of using the obvious, recent whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning, Heffernan uses a story of an “ordinary” individual and her determination to “not to be blind, and not to be silent” to pinpoint a common behavior that has been embedded in corporate organizations, in media, in politics, in communities-- willful blindness happens a lot; it develop from a young age (i.e. how kids ignore seeing other kids being bullied in school because of fear); and it happens everywhere. Take an example of Indian Rape culture, mistreatment of women has been accepted as normal and even a norm until someone persisted to voice it, challenge it, protest it and put it on the international public view. It is amazing how it just take one person to break the silence (that also led me to think about the “otherness” we have talked about in class, and how the role of media representation has an effect on this) and to make everyone feel empowered to swim against the current. Heffernan was right, because of our ignorance; because of our fears of not wanting to bear offenses and retaliation, many of us have CHOSE to keep in silent and stay blind, and because of that, we have lost our freedom—the freedom that we could have used to provide a better quality of life for all humanity.

2 comments:

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAm8Th82ElE

    Can't help being reminded of the intro to Boondock Saints and the finishing line in the Sermon "Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men."

    I've been reading more about the process of "Othering" this weekend for my Bibliography. I agree that the idea of "Willfull Blindness" is in some way a variation on that. When people are faced with a tough decision or situation where their acceptance would expose a personal fault or wrong in themselves,their character or identity, they will often turn a blind eye than admit a weakness. And to cope with the guilt of ignoring the issue, people commit a personal act of "Othering" to create a separation between themselves and the problem. Whether it's ignoring growing health issues, trying to argue against global warming, or standing up for a stranger in need. It's even as simple as walking by trash we see lying on the road and not stopping to pick it up. We just have an innate ability to separate ourselves from instances that cause fear, anxiety or extra labor. And quite often, I'd say, the response is subconscious.

    I think the decision to be more proactive starts by being more aware. Making a conscious effort to slow down and observe what's going on around us. Picking up that empty water bottle on the sidewalk and throwing it away. Even just smiling and saying hi to a stranger. It can change your entire outlook and, who knows, start a movement.

    The protests that started when I was in Istanbul came out of the fact that people who heard that some beloved trees might be cut down went and sat in a park, and read books. Granted, it got more intense than that later, but it started out of an act of compassion and mindfulness. A quiet approach that ignited a major movement that is now questioning authoritarianism and unlawful jailings and limited freedom of press. Just because people said "they're like us", and joined in. The topic of "Othering" came up in my research, because the PM essentially attempted to culturally isolate the protesters from the rest of society. It didn't have the effect he wanted though, as it fueled the fire of his opposition.

    Anyway, I've become rather fascinated with the topic of "Othering/Otherness". Definitely noticing it in many instances now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Little tidbit about me: I used to do a lot of peer education about healthy relationships and how bystanders can prevent dangerous things from happening. Ever hear of the "bystander effect"? It's a social phenomenon which keeps people from intervening or offering help to a victim (or potential victim) for a multitude of reasons: fear of being hurt, feeling the need to mind one's own business (othering?), or thinking that someone else will take care of the situation.

    A horrifying example of the bystander effect came up in 2009 when a gang rape took place outside of a California high school homecoming dance. Multiple people witnessed a 15-year-old girl get beaten and raped, and the witnesses even took photos as the event took place. No one intervened or called the police.

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/10/28/california.gang.rape.bystander/

    ReplyDelete